Australian Payroll Association | News and Resources

The 18 day payroll bombshell: Why your Queensland transfer just got complicated

Written by Louise Missen | May 15, 2026 3:54:23 AM

By Louise Missen | Head of Member Services, Australian Payroll Association

An employee spends a decade with your organisation, six years in Mumbai, four in Melbourne. They relocate to Brisbane for a short term handover assignment. Eighteen days later, they resigned. Suddenly, your business may owe long service leave (LSL) calculated on the basis of the employee’s entire ten years of service.

That is now the practical effect of Queensland’s latest long service leave decision.

What happened?

The Queensland Court of Appeal ruled that Narendra Gade, an employee of Infosys, was entitled to Queensland long service leave after working in Brisbane for less than three weeks. His previous service, largely performed in India and Victoria, was treated as part of his qualifying continuous service for Queensland LSL purposes.

Importantly, Infosys had already paid Mr Gade a gratuity entitlement under Indian law for the same period of service. The Court held that this did not prevent a separate Queensland LSL entitlement from arising.

For employers, the decision significantly expands potential LSL exposure for employees who transfer into Queensland from interstate or overseas operations.

Why this matters for employers

The ruling creates challenges that many payroll and HR systems were never designed to address. Employers now need visibility over service histories that extend well beyond Queensland or even Australia.

Key questions now include:

  • Has the employee previously worked for a related overseas or interstate entity?
  • When did the employee first begin physically performing work in Queensland?
  • Has the organisation already recognised or provisioned for the potential LSL liability attached to prior service?

Traditionally, LSL liabilities have been accrued gradually over years of local service. Under this interpretation, however, an employee may arrive in Queensland with most of the qualifying service period already completed. The liability can arise almost immediately upon commencement of Queensland based work.

Real world risk scenario

Short term project deployments
A Melbourne based consultant with 12 years’ service spends three weeks working from your Brisbane office. Those weeks in Queensland may trigger an LSL entitlement based on the employee’s entire 12 year tenure.

International transfers
An employee works for your Singapore entity for eight years before transferring to Brisbane. Two years later, they may qualify for Queensland LSL calculated across the full ten years of service.

What makes Queensland different?

Courts in Victoria and New South Wales have generally applied a “substantial connection” approach when assessing LSL coverage. Queensland’s legislation, however, refers to service performed “partly in and partly outside the State,” and the Court adopted a broad interpretation of that wording.

The consequence is significant: even relatively brief periods of Queensland service may be sufficient to connect an employee’s entire service history to Queensland’s LSL regime.

The decision also highlights a genuine double payment risk. Although Mr Gade had already received a gratuity payment under Indian law, the Court found that Infosys could not offset that payment against the Queensland LSL entitlement. Employers may therefore face overlapping obligations across multiple jurisdictions for the same service period.

What employers should do now

Before any Queensland transfer or deployment

Employers should:

  • Obtain complete service histories, including related interstate and overseas entities
  • Assess potential LSL exposure before approving Queensland transfers
  • Incorporate LSL risk into workforce mobility and deployment decisions
  • Review employment contracts and secondment arrangements for cross border employees

Payroll and system changes

Payroll, HRIS and mobility systems may require updates to:

  • Track employee service locations by state and country
  • Recognise prior related entity service for Queensland LSL purposes
  • Model contingent LSL liabilities triggered by interstate and international transfers

The unanswered question

The Court confirmed that 18 days of Queensland work was sufficient to establish entitlement but it did not identify a minimum threshold.

Could one week be enough? Several days? A single assignment?

Until further judicial guidance emerges, prudent employers should assume that any meaningful work performed in Queensland may potentially trigger entitlement considerations.

The bottom line

For multi state and multinational employers, Queensland now represents the broadest and potentially most complex LSL jurisdiction in Australia.

Interstate transfers, international secondments and temporary Brisbane deployments can all create unexpected LSL liabilities tied to years of prior service performed elsewhere.

Organisations with mobile workforces should review their payroll systems, mobility policies and provisioning assumptions now. Because under Queensland’s approach, long service leave exposure may begin long before an employee actually starts accumulating service in the state.

Australian Payroll Association members will be kept informed of ongoing developments and emerging compliance considerations including recent Queensland Long Service Leave developments.

In a rapidly changing payroll environment, APA membership provides employers and payroll professionals with timely updates and practical compliance support to help them stay informed and prepared